Illustrative report — sample data, not client results or a live audit
ILLUSTRATIVE CHECKLIST · SAMPLE DATA
Website health checklist
80%8 of 10 checked items passed
Coverage: 10 of 10 sample items assessed (100%).
2 failed · 0 unknown.
See all 10 hypothetical findings
Every finding below is hypothetical. This is an unweighted example, not an assessment of OG Enterprises or a client.
- HTTPSPass — hypothetical
- Primary page loadsPass — hypothetical
- Intended indexing directivePass — hypothetical
- Descriptive titlePass — hypothetical
- Clear primary headingPass — hypothetical
- Internal service linkPass — hypothetical
- Contact linkFail — hypothetical
- Mobile layout: no overflowFail — hypothetical
- Image descriptionsPass — hypothetical
- Image sizingPass — hypothetical
ILLUSTRATIVE CHECKLIST · SAMPLE DATA
AI search readiness checklist
60%3 of 5 checked items passed
Coverage: 5 of 5 sample items assessed (100%).
2 failed · 0 unknown.
See all 5 hypothetical findings
Every finding below is hypothetical. This is an unweighted example, not an assessment of OG Enterprises or a client.
- Intended crawler accessFail — hypothetical
- Primary information available as textFail — hypothetical
- Meaningful page structurePass — hypothetical
- Crawlable internal navigationPass — hypothetical
- Consistent business/service informationPass — hypothetical
Illustrative checks passed; not ranking, traffic, citation probability or business performance. These are simple, unweighted demonstration checklists, not Semrush-equivalent scores or an integrated audit service.
How to read these example scores
Website: 8 passes ÷ 10 assessed items = 80%. AI readiness: 3 passes ÷ 5 assessed items = 60%. Each assessed item has equal weight. Failed items remain in the denominator. Unknown items are not passes and are excluded from that denominator; assessment coverage is shown separately.
A real, unassessed website is Not assessed, with no percentage. For example, 0 of 10 items assessed means 0% coverage and 10 unknown—not a 0% health score. Unknown items would be labeled “Unknown — not assessed.”
A real review needs agreed pages and crawl scope, the tool and version used, a date, evidence for each finding and a repeatable method. We would agree those details before treating findings as verified.